What Does Patanjali Mean by “Steady and Comfortable”?

Written and reviewed by The Kriya Yogi · Updated 16 July 2026

Yoga Sutra 2.46 — sthira sukham asanam — states that asana is steady and comfortable, or that a steady, comfortable position is asana. In Patanjali's text the word asana means the meditation seat, not a repertoire of postures. Sutra 2.47 adds that it is attained by relaxation of effort and by absorption in the infinite, and 2.48 that from it the pairs of opposites cease to disturb. Read together, the three verses describe a seat that becomes effortless — not a standard for how far to stretch.

The short answer

  • Sutra 2.46 concerns the meditation seat; the Yoga Sutras name no postures at all.
  • Sutra 2.47 gives the method: relaxation of effort plus absorption in the infinite.
  • Sthira means steady and unwavering; sukha means ease — neither means flexible or deep.
  • Using the verse as a principle for all modern postures is a reasonable extension, not a translation.

On this page, what the text says, when and why it was written, how practitioners have read it, and what modern research can and cannot support are kept apart on purpose. Collapsing them is how yoga writing becomes unreliable.

Three verses, in full

Three consecutive sutras in chapter two carry the whole of Patanjali's instruction on asana:

  • 2.46 sthira sukham asanam — asana is steady (sthira) and comfortable or easeful (sukha).
  • 2.47 — it is accomplished by a loosening or ceasing of effort and by absorption in the infinite.
  • 2.48 — from that, one is no longer assailed by the pairs of opposites (heat and cold, pleasure and pain).

That is all. The Yoga Sutras name no posture, describe no technique, and give no duration. Asana is the third of the eight limbs, placed after the ethical observances and before pranayama, and it is presented as a precondition for the inward limbs that follow.

Sthira carries the sense of firm, stable, unwavering — it is used elsewhere of steadiness of mind as much as of body. Sukha is literally "good space" and means ease, comfort, the absence of friction; it is the opposite of duhkha, suffering. Neither word means flexible, deep, aligned, or strong.

Why the text says so little about the body

The Yoga Sutras are usually dated to roughly the early centuries of the common era, centuries before hatha yoga's posture literature. The text is a systematic treatment of the mind — its opening moves define yoga as the stilling of mental activity. Its physical instruction is deliberately minimal because the body is not the subject.

This is why reading 2.46 as a rule for postural practice is an anachronism, though a very common one. The verse was written for someone who needed to sit still, for a long time, without the body becoming a topic of attention.

What the commentators emphasise

Commentators from Vyasa onward read 2.47 as the operative instruction: the seat is not achieved by more effort but by the withdrawal of unnecessary effort. What holds you must hold you with as little as possible, so that attention is freed. Absorption in the infinite is read as the mind's object during this settling, which is what turns a physical arrangement into a yogic one.

2.48 is read as the fruit: a seat that no longer registers small discomforts, so that heat, cold and fidget stop interrupting. In lineages that combine Patanjali with hatha, the hatha postures are understood as the means by which a body becomes capable of 2.46, with the sutra stating the destination rather than the method.

Modern teachers frequently use the verse as a guiding principle for all postures — practise at an intensity you can breathe in. That is a defensible extension and often good advice, but it is an application, not a translation.

The motor-control parallel

The verse's practical core — that a sustainable position is one held with the least necessary effort — has a straightforward correspondence in motor control research: skilled performance is typically characterised by reduced co-contraction and lower metabolic cost, with unnecessary muscular activity dropping away as competence develops. Comfortable sitting tolerance also improves with graded exposure and with hip and spinal mobility work, which is why the hatha approach of preparing the body is coherent even though Patanjali does not describe it.

What modern evidence does not support is any claim that a posture held correctly produces specific physiological or psychological outcomes reliably enough to promise. Slow, settled sitting with attention on the breath has consistent effects on subjectively reported stress and modest effects on heart-rate variability; the claim in 2.48 about the pairs of opposites is a description of a contemplative attainment, not a measured result.

Using the verse as a test

The test the verse offers is unusually usable: can you stay here without fighting, and is your breathing quiet? If holding a shape requires gripping, bracing or breath-holding, the verse is telling you the shape is not yet asana for you — regardless of how it looks. Practically, that means using height under the hips, support under the knees, or a wall, without treating support as failure. Our posture pages apply the same test in plain language, and the sitting guidance in the breathing guides exists for exactly this reason.

Where to read the verses

  • Yoga Sutras of Patanjali 2.46–2.48 — compare Edwin Bryant's translation and commentary with Christopher Chapple or Barbara Stoler Miller.
  • Vyasa's Yoga Bhashya, the earliest surviving commentary, for the classical reading of 'relaxation of effort'.

Questions readers ask about sutra 2.46

+ What is the literal translation of sthira sukham asanam?
Word by word: steady (sthira), comfortable or easeful (sukham), seat or posture (asanam). Most translators render it 'asana is a steady, comfortable posture'.
+ Does Patanjali describe any yoga poses?
No. The Yoga Sutras name no individual posture. Asana appears as one of the eight limbs and receives three short verses.
+ Does sukha mean the pose should be easy?
It means without friction or distress rather than effortless from the start. Sutra 2.47 describes ease as something arrived at by dropping unnecessary effort.
+ Can I apply the verse to standing poses?
You can, and many teachers do — practise where you can stay and breathe quietly. Just be clear that this is an application to postures Patanjali never discussed.

Keep reading

Educational content, not medical advice. Check with a doctor before starting new practices if you have a health condition or are pregnant.